2606.16082v1 Jun 15, 2026 cs.CV

Tool-IQA: Augmenting Image Quality Assessment with Simple Tools

Guanyi Qin
Guanyi Qin
Citations: 228
h-index: 7
Yibing Fu
Yibing Fu
Citations: 57
h-index: 4
Tianhe Wu
Tianhe Wu
Citations: 128
h-index: 3
Chunming He
Chunming He
Citations: 112
h-index: 3
Junjie Zhang
Junjie Zhang
Citations: 66
h-index: 2
Jie-Kai Liang
Jie-Kai Liang
Citations: 233
h-index: 6
Lei Zhang
Lei Zhang
Citations: 3
h-index: 1

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have been increasingly adopted for Image Quality Assessment (IQA). However, current methods typically employ a static one-shot scoring paradigm, despite the fact that humans assess image quality through dynamic visual inspection, e.g., selectively adjusting views to verify details and subtle artifacts. Specifically, relying solely on a single-pass observation introduces two primary limitations: first, perceiving the image only at a global scale restricts the assessment of finer local details; second, the original intensity distribution of the image may overwhelm the visibility, leading to insufficient inspection of image quality. To address these issues, we propose Tool-IQA, shifting the assessment mechanism from passive scoring to a tool-augmented workflow. In particular, we equip VLMs with simple yet effective view tools: a Magnifier to inspect local details, and a Gamma Corrector to uncover visibility and hidden artifacts. The assessment follows a structured pipeline that consists of an initial observation with rubric notes, a tool-augmented in-depth inspection, and a final quantification for calibrated quality score. Furthermore, to ensure efficient and purposeful tool callings, we introduce a batch-aware training strategy to reward tool interactions that can yield positive contributions rather than simply encouraging usage. Experiments on a variety of IQA benchmarks demonstrate that, with effective tool calling and calibrated assessment, our proposed Tool-IQA significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art models, e.g., it achieves a PLCC of 0.854 on the challenging CLIVE dataset.

0 Citations
0 Influential
3.5 Altmetric
17.5 Score
Original PDF

No Analysis Report Yet

This paper hasn't been analyzed by Gemini yet.

Log in to request an AI analysis.

댓글

댓글을 작성하려면 로그인하세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 번째 댓글을 남겨보세요!