2606.13673v1 Jun 11, 2026 cs.CV

SpatialClaw: Rethinking Action Interface for Agentic Spatial Reasoning

Yu-Chiang Frank Wang
Yu-Chiang Frank Wang
Citations: 159
h-index: 5
Min-Hung Chen
Min-Hung Chen
Citations: 1,150
h-index: 7
Ryo Hachiuma
Ryo Hachiuma
Citations: 113
h-index: 6
Seungryong Kim
Seungryong Kim
Citations: 335
h-index: 9
Hang Su
Hang Su
Citations: 1
h-index: 1
Subhashree Radhakrishnan
Subhashree Radhakrishnan
Citations: 541
h-index: 8
Seokju Cho
Seokju Cho
Citations: 1,133
h-index: 14
Abhishek Badki
Abhishek Badki
Citations: 240
h-index: 8
Byung-Kwan Lee
Byung-Kwan Lee
Citations: 22
h-index: 3
Sifei Liu
Sifei Liu
Citations: 108
h-index: 3
Changsong Song
Changsong Song
Citations: 0
h-index: 0

Spatial reasoning, the ability to determine where objects are, how they relate, and how they move in 3D, remains a fundamental challenge for vision-language models (VLMs). Tool-augmented agents attempt to address this by augmenting VLMs with specialist perception modules, yet their effectiveness is bounded by the action interface through which those tools are invoked. In this work, we study how the design of this interface shapes the agent's capacity for open-ended spatial reasoning. Existing spatial agents either employ single-pass code execution, which commits to a full analysis strategy before any intermediate result is observed, or rely on a structured tool-call interface that often offers less flexibility for freely composing operations or tailoring the analysis to each task. Both designs offer limited flexibility for open-ended, complex 3D/4D spatial reasoning. We therefore propose SpatialClaw, a training-free framework for spatial reasoning that adopts code as the action interface. SpatialClaw maintains a stateful Python kernel pre-loaded with input frames and a suite of perception and geometry primitives, letting a VLM-backed agent write one executable cell per step conditioned on all prior outputs, enabling the agent to flexibly compose and manipulate perception results and adapt its analysis to both intermediate text and visual observations and the demands of each problem. Evaluated across 20 spatial reasoning benchmarks spanning a broad range of static and dynamic 3D/4D spatial reasoning tasks, SpatialClaw achieves 59.9% average accuracy, outperforming the recent spatial agent by +11.2 points, with consistent gains across six VLM backbones from two model families without any benchmark- or model-specific adaptation.

0 Citations
0 Influential
7 Altmetric
35.0 Score
Original PDF

No Analysis Report Yet

This paper hasn't been analyzed by Gemini yet.

Log in to request an AI analysis.

댓글

댓글을 작성하려면 로그인하세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 번째 댓글을 남겨보세요!