2606.12191v1 Jun 10, 2026 cs.CL

Agentic Environment Engineering for Large Language Models: A Survey of Environment Modeling, Synthesis, Evaluation, and Application

Hongbang Yuan
Hongbang Yuan
Citations: 561
h-index: 8
Zhuoran Jin
Zhuoran Jin
Citations: 607
h-index: 13
Jiachun Li
Jiachun Li
Citations: 172
h-index: 6
Yupu Hao
Yupu Hao
Citations: 50
h-index: 5
Kang Liu
Kang Liu
Citations: 218
h-index: 9
Lu Wang
Lu Wang
Citations: 38
h-index: 3
Dongqi Huang
Dongqi Huang
Citations: 0
h-index: 0
Tianyi Men
Tianyi Men
Citations: 104
h-index: 5
Kejian Zhu
Kejian Zhu
Citations: 30
h-index: 3
Ling Wang
Ling Wang
Citations: 0
h-index: 0
Longxiang Wang
Longxiang Wang
Citations: 2
h-index: 1
Shengjia Hua
Shengjia Hua
Citations: 21
h-index: 2
Jinshan Gao
Jinshan Gao
Citations: 0
h-index: 0
Ruiling Xu
Ruiling Xu
Citations: 14
h-index: 2
Jun Zhao
Jun Zhao
Citations: 901
h-index: 17

Environments serve as interactive systems for large language model (LLM) based agents across diverse scenarios and play a crucial role in driving the continual evolution of model capabilities. Despite this importance, existing work lacks a systematic categorization and deep analysis. This paper systematically studies current researches on agentic environments from the perspective of the environment engineering lifecycle, covering their modeling, synthesis, evaluation and application. Specifically, the paper first introduces representative environments from the perspectives of eight attributes and eight domains, providing detailed analyses of their development paths and highlighting their core capabilities. Second, for automated environment synthesis, two paradigms are introduced, such as symbolic synthesis and neural synthesis. This paper also shows different environment evaluation methods in each paradigm. Thirdly, the corresponding environment applications from the perspective of agent-environment co-evolution are discussed. In specific, the paper characterizes the primary pathways for agent evolution in dynamic environments from four complementary perspectives: memory-centric experience evolution, orchestration-centric workflow evolution, trajectory-centric offline evolution, and exploration-centric online evolution. And three paradigms of environment evolution are identified, namely neural-driven, difficulty-driven, and scaling-driven approaches. At last, several promising future directions are discussed, including Environment-as-a-Service, Multi-agent Environments, and Neural-Symbolic Environments.

0 Citations
0 Influential
8.5 Altmetric
42.5 Score
Original PDF

No Analysis Report Yet

This paper hasn't been analyzed by Gemini yet.

Log in to request an AI analysis.

댓글

댓글을 작성하려면 로그인하세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 번째 댓글을 남겨보세요!