2606.10752v1 Jun 09, 2026 cs.AI

AutoPDE: Reliable Agentic PDE Solving via Explicitly Represented Solver Strategies

Zhezheng Hao
Zhezheng Hao
Citations: 69
h-index: 4
Huanshuo Dong
Huanshuo Dong
Citations: 60
h-index: 4
Ziyan Liu
Ziyan Liu
Citations: 597
h-index: 8
Keyao Zhang
Keyao Zhang
Citations: 36
h-index: 4
Hong Wang
Hong Wang
Citations: 94
h-index: 6
Zhiwei Zhuang
Zhiwei Zhuang
Citations: 6
h-index: 1
Jiacong Wang
Jiacong Wang
Citations: 78
h-index: 4
Gengyuan Liu
Gengyuan Liu
Citations: 7
h-index: 1
Xing Jin
Xing Jin
Citations: 305
h-index: 6

Numerical solvers for partial differential equations (PDEs) are core computational tools in science and engineering. Building reliable PDE solvers requires not only executable code, but a numerical solver strategy, a set of decisions about discretization, stabilization, solver configuration, and resolution control, that matches the PDE structure. Recent LLM-based coding agents have begun to reduce the programming burden by generating and debugging solver implementations. However, they typically move directly from a PDE problem to solver code, leaving the solver strategy implicit in implementation details. Feedback from a failed solve is therefore routed back to code edits rather than to the underlying strategy, so numerical decisions remain hard to check before code is generated and hard to revise using numerical evidence when it fails. To address this limitation, we propose AutoPDE, a code agent that maintains the solver strategy as an explicitly represented object throughout the solving process: an independent, inspectable object that is built before any code is written and can be revised, using numerical evidence, whenever a solve fails. AutoPDE builds and maintains this object in three stages, all drawing from a library of reusable PDE-solving skills: PDE analysis identifies the equation type and algebraic structure; numerical method selection chooses a numerical method that matches the analysis result and commits to a discretization, stabilization, and linear solver accordingly; and adaptive tuning runs low-cost pilot solves to calibrate resolution and tolerances under the prescribed accuracy and runtime budget. We evaluate AutoPDE on the PDE Agent Bench, where experimental results show that AutoPDE achieves a pass rate of $54.5%$, improving over the strongest baseline by $14.2$ percentage points.

0 Citations
0 Influential
4 Altmetric
20.0 Score
Original PDF

No Analysis Report Yet

This paper hasn't been analyzed by Gemini yet.

Log in to request an AI analysis.

댓글

댓글을 작성하려면 로그인하세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 번째 댓글을 남겨보세요!