2606.08938v1 Jun 08, 2026 cs.CL

PACT: Learning Diverse Diagnostic Strategies via Privileged Synthesis and Branch Consensus

Zhichao Yang
Zhichao Yang
Citations: 34
h-index: 3
Gen Li
Gen Li
Citations: 5
h-index: 1
Yuanze Hu
Yuanze Hu
Citations: 4
h-index: 1
Faguo Wu
Faguo Wu
Citations: 4
h-index: 1
Hongwei Zheng
Hongwei Zheng
Citations: 3
h-index: 1
Jianwei Lv
Jianwei Lv
Citations: 121
h-index: 4
Bo Yuan
Bo Yuan
Citations: 47
h-index: 2
Xiandong Li
Xiandong Li
Citations: 3
h-index: 1
Qingchen Yu
Qingchen Yu
Citations: 4
h-index: 1
Yue (Sophie) Guo
Yue (Sophie) Guo
Carnegie Mellon University
Citations: 201
h-index: 7
Yujing Liu
Yujing Liu
Citations: 10
h-index: 2
Yifan Sun
Yifan Sun
Citations: 10
h-index: 2
Zhaoxin Fan
Zhaoxin Fan
Citations: 3
h-index: 1

Clinical diagnosis requires flexible use of multiple reasoning paradigms under incomplete patient information. Existing LLM-based medical agents show strong medical reasoning ability, but single-paradigm or naively mixed dialogue supervision makes these paradigms difficult to learn without interference. We propose \textbf{PACT} (Periodic Anchor Consensus Training), a framework that couples supervised multi-paradigm dialogue synthesis with consensus-based Branch training. At the data level, \textbf{DPS} (Doctor-Patient-Supervisor) uses complete electronic medical records (EMRs) for quality control while keeping the doctor agent restricted to patient-visible information. This produces validated dialogues under four diagnostic reasoning paradigms without leaking hidden clinical answers. At the training level, PACT trains one paradigm-specific LoRA Branch per paradigm and periodically aggregates Branches into a shared Anchor through sign consensus. We further construct a dynamic multi-turn Chinese medical diagnosis benchmark for interactive consultation. Experiments show that PACT achieves state-of-the-art performance among compared proprietary, medical-specialized, and task-adapted baselines on diagnostic outcome and consultation-process metrics.

0 Citations
0 Influential
3.5 Altmetric
17.5 Score
Original PDF

No Analysis Report Yet

This paper hasn't been analyzed by Gemini yet.

Log in to request an AI analysis.

댓글

댓글을 작성하려면 로그인하세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 번째 댓글을 남겨보세요!