2605.26434v1 May 26, 2026 cs.LG

Aperiodic and Low-Frequency Spectral Bias in Reconstruction based EEG Foundation Models

Tiantian Feng
Tiantian Feng
Citations: 1,184
h-index: 19
Kleanthis Avramidis
Kleanthis Avramidis
University of Southern California
Citations: 171
h-index: 8
Shrikanth S. Narayanan
Shrikanth S. Narayanan
Citations: 39
h-index: 3
Aditya Kommineni
Aditya Kommineni
Citations: 83
h-index: 4
Richard M. Leahy
Richard M. Leahy
Citations: 22
h-index: 2
E. Zhou
E. Zhou
Citations: 11
h-index: 1
Simon Bock Segaard
Simon Bock Segaard
Citations: 0
h-index: 0
Jeppe Roden Munster
Jeppe Roden Munster
Citations: 0
h-index: 0
Andreas Peter Juhl Hansen
Andreas Peter Juhl Hansen
Citations: 0
h-index: 0
Takfarinas Medani
Takfarinas Medani
Citations: 355
h-index: 9

EEG foundation models, pre-trained on large-scale unlabelled EEG data, have emerged as a promising direction towards learning generalizable EEG representations. Despite showing positive results in data-rich regimes, they often fail to outperform significantly smaller supervised models in low-resource settings compared to fully supervised models. We provide a mechanistic account of this shortcoming, attributing it to a fundamental mismatch between reconstruction-based pretext tasks and the idiosyncratic spectral structure of EEG signals, which decompose into distinct high-power aperiodic and low-power oscillatory components. Using controlled, synthetically-generated EEG inputs, we demonstrate that EEG foundation model embeddings are biased to capture the aperiodic components of the EEG signal while under-representing oscillatory components, particularly at higher frequencies. Additionally, linear probe evaluations on real-world BCI datasets further reveal that embeddings encode subject identity more strongly than task-relevant information, thereby reinforcing the low-frequency and aperiodic component bias in foundation model embeddings trained primarily on reconstruction based objectives. Together, these findings elucidate a failure mode in reconstruction based EEG foundation models and motivate future work to incorporate auxiliary losses explicitly targeting high-frequency oscillatory structure as a path toward more capable and generalizable EEG representations.

0 Citations
0 Influential
9.5 Altmetric
47.5 Score
Original PDF

No Analysis Report Yet

This paper hasn't been analyzed by Gemini yet.

Log in to request an AI analysis.

댓글

댓글을 작성하려면 로그인하세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 번째 댓글을 남겨보세요!