2605.26969v1 May 26, 2026 cs.CL

Recon: Reconstruction-Guided Reasoning Synthesis for User Modeling

Carolyn Wang
Carolyn Wang
Citations: 89
h-index: 3
Alan Zhu
Alan Zhu
Citations: 40
h-index: 3
Mihran Miroyan
Mihran Miroyan
Citations: 76
h-index: 5
Narges Norouzi
Narges Norouzi
Citations: 39
h-index: 4
Andrew Zhou
Andrew Zhou
Citations: 2
h-index: 1
Lisa Dunlap
Lisa Dunlap
Citations: 1,506
h-index: 14
Joseph E. Gonzalez
Joseph E. Gonzalez
Citations: 171
h-index: 4

User modeling aims to use language models (LMs) to mimic an individual's behavior from a corpus of past context-action pairs (e.g., conversation turns), enabling the simulation of users in settings like behavioral science, human-AI collaboration, and market research. Recent approaches augment these corpora with synthesized reasoning traces, typically generated by conditioning on both context and action. However, such conditioning constitutes post-hoc rationalization rather than reasoning: the trace is guaranteed to justify the action, but may not encode the underlying latent causal decision paths. We propose Recon, which uses action reconstruction to score reasoning traces by their predictive power: given a context and candidate reasoning, a reconstruction model predicts the action, and reconstruction fidelity determines reasoning quality. Across four domains, Recon achieves a 54.7% win rate over Backward Synthesis, a standard post-hoc rationalization baseline. Further, we find that training a reasoning synthesis model with rewards derived from Recon improves downstream user modeling performance, achieving a win rate of up to 70.0% over baselines. We further show that Recon-synthesized reasoning transfers across models, and improves user modeling beyond the reconstruction model. Our work demonstrates that post-hoc rationalization is insufficient for reasoning synthesis, and that useful and interpretable reasoning should naturally elicit the action from the context.

0 Citations
0 Influential
7 Altmetric
35.0 Score
Original PDF

No Analysis Report Yet

This paper hasn't been analyzed by Gemini yet.

Log in to request an AI analysis.

댓글

댓글을 작성하려면 로그인하세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 번째 댓글을 남겨보세요!