2605.27082v1 May 26, 2026 cs.AI

Can Broad Biomedical Knowledge be Contextualized into Scenario-Grounded Propositions?

Ziyang Chen
Ziyang Chen
Citations: 46
h-index: 4
Anglin Liu
Anglin Liu
Citations: 25
h-index: 2
Jintai Chen
Jintai Chen
Citations: 2,541
h-index: 24
Qing Zeng
Qing Zeng
Citations: 92
h-index: 1
Pengxiang Cai
Pengxiang Cai
Citations: 9
h-index: 2
Zixin Guan
Zixin Guan
Citations: 2
h-index: 1
Lang Qin
Lang Qin
Citations: 8
h-index: 2
Xinyao Lai
Xinyao Lai
Citations: 1
h-index: 1

Biomedical discovery often requires connecting broad biomedical knowledge with specific experimental or clinical data. Background knowledge suggests relevant mechanisms but is usually too general to map directly onto dataset variables, while data-driven patterns can be dataset-specific and hard to interpret mechanistically. We study this missing link as knowledge contextualization: transforming broad biomedical knowledge into evidence-supported, scenario-grounded propositions that domain experts can inspect, replay, and validate. We propose SCENE, a bi-level multi-agent framework that treats knowledge contextualization as iterative search. The upper level converts broad knowledge into search directions and grounds them in the dataset schema. The lower level executes these directions through multi-objective optimization to identify concrete propositions that balance evidential strength and data support. Feedback between the two levels progressively refines the search. We evaluate SCENE in two settings: discovering patient subgroups with heterogeneous treatment benefits in clinical trial scenarios, and identifying context-specific biological responses in LINCS L1000 studies. In clinical trials, SCENE discovers specific, well-supported subgroups and outperforms existing baselines. In L1000 studies, SCENE identifies perturbational contexts with strong target-response matching and high positive rates. These results show that SCENE bridges broad knowledge and scenario-specific evidence, producing traceable, inspectable hypotheses for follow-up validation.

0 Citations
0 Influential
12 Altmetric
60.0 Score
Original PDF

No Analysis Report Yet

This paper hasn't been analyzed by Gemini yet.

Log in to request an AI analysis.

댓글

댓글을 작성하려면 로그인하세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 번째 댓글을 남겨보세요!