2605.27276v1 May 26, 2026 cs.AI

SIA: Self Improving AI with Harness & Weight Updates

Alesia Ivanova
Alesia Ivanova
Citations: 9
h-index: 2
Vignesh Baskaran
Vignesh Baskaran
Citations: 29
h-index: 2
Prannay Hebbar
Prannay Hebbar
Citations: 31
h-index: 1
Yogendra Manawat
Yogendra Manawat
Citations: 0
h-index: 0
Samuel Verboomen
Samuel Verboomen
Citations: 0
h-index: 0
Selvam Palanimalai
Selvam Palanimalai
Citations: 13
h-index: 2
Kunal Bhatia
Kunal Bhatia
Citations: 8
h-index: 2

Humans are the bottleneck in building and improving AI. Both the models and the agents that wrap them are written, tuned, and corrected by people. The long-horizon goal of an AI that can figure out how to improve itself remains open. Two largely disjoint research lines attack this bottleneck. The harness-update school has a meta-agent rewrite the scaffold of a task-specific agent (its tools, prompts, retry logic, and search procedure) while the model weights are held fixed. The test-time training school uses hand-written RL pipelines to update the model's own weights on task feedback while the harness is held fixed. These two silos operate in isolation. We propose SIA, a self-improving loop in which a language-model agent (the Feedback-Agent) updates both the harness and the weights of a task-specific agent. We evaluate across three contrasting domains: Chinese legal charge classification, low-level GPU kernel optimisation, and single-cell RNA denoising. Combining both levers outperforms scaffold iteration alone on all three benchmarks. The gains are 56.6% on LawBench, 91.9% runtime reduction on GPU kernels, and 502% on denoising over the initial baseline. Harness updates make the model agentic, shaping how it searches and acts, while weight updates build the domain intuition that no prompt or scaffold can instil.

0 Citations
0 Influential
1 Altmetric
5.0 Score
Original PDF

No Analysis Report Yet

This paper hasn't been analyzed by Gemini yet.

Log in to request an AI analysis.

댓글

댓글을 작성하려면 로그인하세요.

아직 댓글이 없습니다. 첫 번째 댓글을 남겨보세요!