Liming Zhu
Publications
SkillZip: Contract-Preserving Graph Compression for Scalable Agent Skill Libraries
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly act as agents whose procedural knowledge is stored in reusable skill packages and loaded at inference time. As skill libraries grow, a central challenge is to expose the smallest sufficient executable context under a limited context budget. Existing systems struggle to reuse routines below the whole-skill level, preserve procedural contracts during compression, keep compressed routines executable and expandable, and update the compressed library as skills evolve. These challenges reveal a unit mismatch: skills are retrieved as packages, compressed as text, and converted into execution graphs only after retrieval, whereas reliable reuse requires a contract-bearing procedural unit. We propose SkillZip, an execution-aware procedural abstraction framework that performs contract-preserving compression over section-level graphs. SkillZip rewrites recurring contract-valid motifs into reversible ported macros while preserving boundary signatures, dependency closure, verifier reachability, and source-level expansion. At inference time, it hydrates a compact, dependency-closed context and expands macros only when required. ReZip further integrates new skills and revises risky macros using execution evidence. Comprehensive experiments1 on technical and embodied agent benchmarks show SkillZip consistently outperforms the strongest baseline by up to 12.2 points, while achieving a 3.46x compression ratio with 99.2% dependency preservation and 98.7% verifier reachability. Scaling analyses further confirm robust retrieval across skill libraries ranging from 200 to 100K skills.
Interpretable Column Annotation with LLM-Symbolized Decision Process Materialization
Column annotation (CA), including column type annotation (CTA) and column property annotation (CPA), aims to identify the meanings of table columns and the semantic relationships among them. Recent CA methods usually use various neural models to learn column representations and directly map them to label categories, thereby (1) sacrificing model interpretability and adaptivity, and (2) overlooking rich label semantics and ultimately limiting accuracy. To address these limitations, we propose SymCA, an LLM-empowered interpretable CA framework that materializes column annotation as a global-to-local symbolic decision process. SymCA consists of two components: (1) global skeleton induction, which constructs a semantic skeleton over the label space, and (2) local substrate evolution, which evolves predictive substrates within the skeleton. Specifically, to exploit label semantics while preserving an interpretable decision process, the global skeleton induction module leverages LLMs to generate candidate hypernym-inspired tree-structured semantic skeletons and employs a Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR)-based consensus strategy to select a robust skeleton against generation variance. Since different internal nodes require different evidence to distinguish among their child nodes, the local substrate evolution module materializes each internal node as an executable and evolvable predictive substrate. Over multiple evolution rounds, each substrate trains an interpretable random forest classifier with the current operator set, leverages the LLM to propose node-specific operator modifications, and uses an exploration-exploitation strategy to prioritize promising substrates. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SymCA is accurate, robust, and interpretable, outperforming the strongest baselines by an average of 6.42% in Micro-F1 and 11.03% in Macro-F1.
LLM-as-Judge in Education: A Curriculum-Grounded Marking Pipeline
Generative AI and large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to question generation and automated assessment. However, deploying LLMs in preparation for high-stakes exams requires more than prompt engineering; it demands software pipelines that systematically ground model outputs in authorised curriculum artefacts and marking guidelines issued by education authorities. This paper presents a curriculum-grounded, configurable LLM-as-Judge pipeline for question-level marking, co-developed with an industrial partner, to support exam preparation for university admission. The pipeline identifies the relevant topics, subtopics, and cognitive demand of a question, and assembles verifiable and authorised context to support LLM judgement. Curriculum intent is operationalised through concrete syllabus artefacts, including prescribed verbs and outcomes, performance band descriptors, glossary definitions, and marking-guideline principles. A staged LLM workflow is employed to first generate question-specific rubrics, capturing structured expectations of performance, and then derive and evaluate marking criteria used to allocate marks to student responses. This design improves consistency, transparency, and alignment with official marking practices. Preliminary evaluation shows that the proposed LLM-as-Judge pipeline delivers marking outcomes comparable to human tutors, while yielding justifications that are more traceable to authorised curriculum artefacts and marking standards. The pipeline has also been integrated into an online study platform, where early deployment data provide initial insights into operational usage and manual overrides.