Haotian Liu
Publications
PilotBench: A Benchmark for General Aviation Agents with Safety Constraints
As Large Language Models (LLMs) advance toward embodied AI agents operating in physical environments, a fundamental question emerges: can models trained on text corpora reliably reason about complex physics while adhering to safety constraints? We address this through PilotBench, a benchmark evaluating LLMs on safety-critical flight trajectory and attitude prediction. Built from 708 real-world general aviation trajectories spanning nine operationally distinct flight phases with synchronized 34-channel telemetry, PilotBench systematically probes the intersection of semantic understanding and physics-governed prediction through comparative analysis of LLMs and traditional forecasters. We introduce Pilot-Score, a composite metric balancing 60% regression accuracy with 40% instruction adherence and safety compliance. Comparative evaluation across 41 models uncovers a Precision-Controllability Dichotomy: traditional forecasters achieve superior MAE of 7.01 but lack semantic reasoning capabilities, while LLMs gain controllability with 86--89% instruction-following at the cost of 11--14 MAE precision. Phase-stratified analysis further exposes a Dynamic Complexity Gap-LLM performance degrades sharply in high-workload phases such as Climb and Approach, suggesting brittle implicit physics models. These empirical discoveries motivate hybrid architectures combining LLMs' symbolic reasoning with specialized forecasters' numerical precision. PilotBench provides a rigorous foundation for advancing embodied AI in safety-constrained domains.
SayNext-Bench: Why Do LLMs Struggle with Next-Utterance Prediction?
We explore the use of large language models (LLMs) for next-utterance prediction in human dialogue. Despite recent advances in LLMs demonstrating their ability to engage in natural conversations with users, we show that even leading models surprisingly struggle to predict a human speaker's next utterance. Instead, humans can readily anticipate forthcoming utterances based on multimodal cues, such as gestures, gaze, and emotional tone, from the context. To systematically examine whether LLMs can reproduce this ability, we propose SayNext-Bench, a benchmark that evaluates LLMs and Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) on anticipating context-conditioned responses from multimodal cues spanning a variety of real-world scenarios. To support this benchmark, we build SayNext-PC, a novel large-scale dataset containing dialogues with rich multimodal cues. Building on this, we further develop a dual-route prediction MLLM, SayNext-Chat, that incorporates cognitively inspired design to emulate predictive processing in conversation. Experimental results demonstrate that our model outperforms state-of-the-art MLLMs in terms of lexical overlap, semantic similarity, and emotion consistency. Our results prove the feasibility of next-utterance prediction with LLMs from multimodal cues and emphasize the (i) indispensable role of multimodal cues and (ii) actively predictive processing as the foundation of natural human interaction, which is missing in current MLLMs. We hope that this exploration offers a new research entry toward more human-like, context-sensitive AI interaction for human-centered AI. Our benchmark and model can be accessed at https://saynext.github.io/.