Heejun Lee
Publications
OmniRetrieval: Unified Retrieval across Heterogeneous Knowledge Sources
Real-world information needs require access to structurally diverse knowledge sources, from unstructured text and relational tables to knowledge graphs and property graphs. Existing retrievers, however, operate over one source at a time under a fixed query language, leaving the broader landscape of available knowledge fragmented behind incompatible interfaces. A natural attempt at unification would collapse these sources into a shared space, but this erases the structural affordances (such as schemas, ontologies, compositional operators) that give each source its expressive power. Effective retrieval over diverse knowledge, therefore, requires not homogenization but an overarching layer that meets each source on its own terms. To achieve this, we present OmniRetrieval, a framework that takes any natural-language query, identifies appropriate knowledge sources, and dispatches source-native queries to their native execution engines. Across an extensive benchmark spanning 13 datasets and 309 distinct knowledge bases over text, relational, and graph-structured sources, OmniRetrieval exceeds single-source baselines, demonstrating that it can serve as a general-purpose interface to the heterogeneous sources while preserving the structural distinctions that make each source valuable.
TS-Debate: Multimodal Collaborative Debate for Zero-Shot Time Series Reasoning
Recent progress at the intersection of large language models (LLMs) and time series (TS) analysis has revealed both promise and fragility. While LLMs can reason over temporal structure given carefully engineered context, they often struggle with numeric fidelity, modality interference, and principled cross-modal integration. We present TS-Debate, a modality-specialized, collaborative multi-agent debate framework for zero-shot time series reasoning. TS-Debate assigns dedicated expert agents to textual context, visual patterns, and numerical signals, preceded by explicit domain knowledge elicitation, and coordinates their interaction via a structured debate protocol. Reviewer agents evaluate agent claims using a verification-conflict-calibration mechanism, supported by lightweight code execution and numerical lookup for programmatic verification. This architecture preserves modality fidelity, exposes conflicting evidence, and mitigates numeric hallucinations without task-specific fine-tuning. Across 20 tasks spanning three public benchmarks, TS-Debate achieves consistent and significant performance improvements over strong baselines, including standard multimodal debate in which all agents observe all inputs.