Qinqian Lei
Publications
A Study of Failure Modes in Two-Stage Human-Object Interaction Detection
Human-object interaction (HOI) detection aims to detect interactions between humans and objects in images. While recent advances have improved performance on existing benchmarks, their evaluations mainly focus on overall prediction accuracy and provide limited insight into the underlying causes of model failures. In particular, modern models often struggle in complex scenes involving multiple people and rare interaction combinations. In this work, we present a study to better understand the failure modes of two-stage HOI models, which form the basis of many current HOI detection approaches. Rather than constructing a large-scale benchmark, we instead decompose HOI detection into multiple interpretable perspectives and analyze model behavior across these dimensions to study different types of failure patterns. We curate a subset of images from an existing HOI dataset organized by human-object-interaction configurations (e.g., multi-person interactions and object sharing), and analyze model behavior under these configurations to examine different failure modes. This design allows us to analyze how these HOI models behave under different scene compositions and why their predictions fail. Importantly, high overall benchmark performance does not necessarily reflect robust visual reasoning about human-object relationships. We hope that this study can provide useful insights into the limitations of HOI models and offer observations for future research in this area.
SHOE: Semantic HOI Open-Vocabulary Evaluation Metric
Open-vocabulary human-object interaction (HOI) detection is a step towards building scalable systems that generalize to unseen interactions in real-world scenarios and support grounded multimodal systems that reason about human-object relationships. However, standard evaluation metrics, such as mean Average Precision (mAP), treat HOI classes as discrete categorical labels and fail to credit semantically valid but lexically different predictions (e.g., "lean on couch" vs. "sit on couch"), limiting their applicability for evaluating open-vocabulary predictions that go beyond any predefined set of HOI labels. We introduce SHOE (Semantic HOI Open-Vocabulary Evaluation), a new evaluation framework that incorporates semantic similarity between predicted and ground-truth HOI labels. SHOE decomposes each HOI prediction into its verb and object components, estimates their semantic similarity using the average of multiple large language models (LLMs), and combines them into a similarity score to evaluate alignment beyond exact string match. This enables a flexible and scalable evaluation of both existing HOI detection methods and open-ended generative models using standard benchmarks such as HICO-DET. Experimental results show that SHOE scores align more closely with human judgments than existing metrics, including LLM-based and embedding-based baselines, achieving an agreement of 85.73% with the average human ratings. Our work underscores the need for semantically grounded HOI evaluation that better mirrors human understanding of interactions. We will release our evaluation metric to the public to facilitate future research.