Saeed Anwar
Publications
UBLLIE: Unified Backlight and Low-Light Image Enhancement
Backlit and low-light images often suffer from severe exposure imbalance or global underexposure, presenting significant challenges for both visual perception and downstream computer vision tasks. In this paper, we propose a unified, unsupervised enhancement framework that addresses both types of degradation without relying on paired ground-truth data. Our approach builds on CLIP-guided prompt learning to semantically supervise enhancement using learned positive and negative textual prompts. To improve the quality of our improvements over prior work, we design a symmetric residual U-Net backbone augmented with an Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling module. This architecture captures multi-scale contextual information, enabling adaptive correction under spatially heterogeneous illumination. During training, the enhancement network is guided by CLIP-based semantic similarity losses and refined via an iterative prompt optimization mechanism. Extensive experiments on both paired and unpaired datasets, including BAID, Backlit300, LOL, and VE-LOL-L, demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms state-of-the-art supervised and unsupervised methods in terms of fidelity, perceptual quality, and generalization. Furthermore, our work emphasizes the need for stronger benchmarking protocols for backlit enhancement, a relatively underexplored area. The proposed framework provides a robust, scalable solution for real-world illumination enhancement across diverse lighting conditions.
Mind the Rarities: Can Rare Skin Diseases Be Reliably Diagnosed via Diagnostic Reasoning?
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) demonstrate strong performance in dermatology; however, evaluating diagnostic reasoning for rare conditions remains largely unexplored. Existing benchmarks focus on common diseases and assess only final accuracy, overlooking the clinical reasoning process, which is critical for complex cases. We address this gap by constructing DermCase, a long-context benchmark derived from peer-reviewed case reports. Our dataset contains 26,030 multi-modal image-text pairs and 6,354 clinically challenging cases, each annotated with comprehensive clinical information and step-by-step reasoning chains. To enable reliable evaluation, we establish DermLIP-based similarity metrics that achieve stronger alignment with dermatologists for assessing differential diagnosis quality. Benchmarking 22 leading LVLMs exposes significant deficiencies across diagnosis accuracy, differential diagnosis, and clinical reasoning. Fine-tuning experiments demonstrate that instruction tuning substantially improves performance while Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) yields minimal gains. Systematic error analysis further reveals critical limitations in current models' reasoning capabilities.