N. Papadopoulos
Publications
Gaze patterns predict preference and confidence in pairwise AI image evaluation
Preference learning methods, such as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), rely on pairwise human judgments, yet little is known about the cognitive processes underlying these judgments. We investigate whether eye-tracking can reveal preference formation during pairwise AI-generated image evaluation. Thirty participants completed 1,800 trials while their gaze was recorded. We replicated the gaze cascade effect, with gaze shifting toward chosen images approximately one second before the decision. Cascade dynamics were consistent across confidence levels. Gaze features predicted binary choice (68% accuracy), with chosen images receiving more dwell time, fixations, and revisits. Gaze transitions distinguished high-confidence from uncertain decisions (66% accuracy), with low-confidence trials showing more image switches per second. These results show that gaze patterns predict both choice and confidence in pairwise image evaluations, suggesting that eye-tracking provides implicit signals relevant to the quality of preference annotations.
Hide and Seek: Investigating Redundancy in Earth Observation Imagery
The growing availability of Earth Observation (EO) data and recent advances in Computer Vision have driven rapid progress in machine learning for EO, producing domain-specific models at ever-increasing scales. Yet this progress risks overlooking fundamental properties of EO data that distinguish it from other domains. We argue that EO data exhibit a multidimensional redundancy (spectral, temporal, spatial, and semantic) which has a more pronounced impact on the domain and its applications than what current literature reflects. To validate this hypothesis, we conduct a systematic domain-specific investigation examining the existence, consistency, and practical implications of this phenomenon across key dimensions of EO variability. Our findings confirm that redundancy in EO data is both substantial and pervasive: exploiting it yields comparable performance ($\approx98.5\%$ of baseline) at a fraction of the computational cost ($\approx4\times$ fewer GFLOPs), at both training and inference. Crucially, these gains are consistent across tasks, geospatial locations, sensors, ground sampling distances, and architectural designs; suggesting that multi-faceted redundancy is a structural property of EO data rather than an artifact of specific experimental choices. These results lay the groundwork for more efficient, scalable, and accessible large-scale EO models.