Yuan Qi
Publications
DyJR: Preserving Diversity in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards via Dynamic Jensen-Shannon Replay
While Reinforcement Learning (RL) enhances Large Language Model reasoning, on-policy algorithms like GRPO are sample-inefficient as they discard past rollouts. Existing experience replay methods address this by reusing accurate samples for direct policy updates, but this often incurs high computational costs and causes mode collapse via overfitting. We argue that historical data should prioritize sustaining diversity rather than simply reinforcing accuracy. To this end, we propose Dynamic Jensen-Shannon Replay (DyJR), a simple yet effective regularization framework using a dynamic reference distribution from recent trajectories. DyJR introduces two innovations: (1) A Time-Sensitive Dynamic Buffer that uses FIFO and adaptive sizing to retain only temporally proximal samples, synchronizing with model evolution; and (2) Jensen-Shannon Divergence Regularization, which replaces direct gradient updates with a distributional constraint to prevent diversity collapse. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and Text-to-SQL benchmarks demonstrate that DyJR significantly outperforms GRPO as well as baselines such as RLEP and Ex-GRPO, while maintaining training efficiency comparable to the original GRPO. Furthermore, from the perspective of Rank-$k$ token probability evolution, we show that DyJR enhances diversity and mitigates over-reliance on Rank-1 tokens, elucidating how specific sub-modules of DyJR influence the training dynamics.
InterveneBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Intervention Reasoning and Causal Study Design in Real Social Systems
Causal inference in social science relies on end-to-end, intervention-centered research-design reasoning grounded in real-world policy interventions, but current benchmarks fail to evaluate this capability of large language models (LLMs). We present InterveneBench, a benchmark designed to assess such reasoning in realistic social settings. Each instance in InterveneBench is derived from an empirical social science study and requires models to reason about policy interventions and identification assumptions without access to predefined causal graphs or structural equations. InterveneBench comprises 744 peer-reviewed studies across diverse policy domains. Experimental results show that state-of-the-art LLMs struggle under this setting. To address this limitation, we further propose a multi-agent framework, STRIDES. It achieves significant performance improvements over state-of-the-art reasoning models. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/Sii-yuning/STRIDES.