Junjie Li
Publications
MetaVideoAgent: Automated Video-Agent Evolution for Long-Form Video Understanding
Long-form video understanding requires locating sparse, question-relevant evidence in long, multimodal videos. Real-world video distributions differ in modality-specific information density, content structure, and evidence patterns, causing fixed video-agent designs to incur redundant processing or fail when mismatched. Extending automated agent evolution from text to video is challenging because full long-video execution makes candidate validation expensive, failures propagate across coupled evidence-processing stages, and complex preprocessing, perception tools, and localization strategies make code-level updates difficult to implement reliably. We introduce MetaVideoAgent, a framework that automatically evolves a video agent for a target distribution. It profiles information density and evidence requirements from sparsely sampled frames and associated queries to guide initial design, then compresses localized failures into independently executable minimal validation tasks. It constructs evidence-grounded Gold Paths, audits Student trajectories, aggregates recurring failures across samples, and attributes them to responsible modules. A modular agent representation constrains each update to the primary responsible module and its necessary dependencies. We further introduce VA-EvoBench, covering eight video distributions with separate evolution and held-out splits. With four evolution iterations per distribution, MetaVideoAgent improves every initial agent and raises macro-average accuracy from 38.44% to 51.47%, at an average evolution cost of 3.54M tokens per distribution. The evolved agents outperform the strongest prior fixed-design video agent by 6.39 percentage points while using the fewest tokens and video frames per question among the compared video agents. We will release all code and data to support reproducible research.
Lost in Stories: Consistency Bugs in Long Story Generation by LLMs
What happens when a storyteller forgets its own story? Large Language Models (LLMs) can now generate narratives spanning tens of thousands of words, but they often fail to maintain consistency throughout. When generating long-form narratives, these models can contradict their own established facts, character traits, and world rules. Existing story generation benchmarks focus mainly on plot quality and fluency, leaving consistency errors largely unexplored. To address this gap, we present ConStory-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate narrative consistency in long-form story generation. It contains 2,000 prompts across four task scenarios and defines a taxonomy of five error categories with 19 fine-grained subtypes. We also develop ConStory-Checker, an automated pipeline that detects contradictions and grounds each judgment in explicit textual evidence. Evaluating a range of LLMs through five research questions, we find that consistency errors show clear tendencies: they are most common in factual and temporal dimensions, tend to appear around the middle of narratives, occur in text segments with higher token-level entropy, and certain error types tend to co-occur. These findings can inform future efforts to improve consistency in long-form narrative generation. Our project page is available at https://picrew.github.io/constory-bench.github.io/.