Bolian Li
Publications
SARL: Label-Free Reinforcement Learning by Rewarding Reasoning Topology
Reinforcement learning has become central to improving large reasoning models, but its success still relies heavily on verifiable rewards or labeled supervision. This limits its applicability to open ended domains where correctness is ambiguous and cannot be verified. Moreover, reasoning trajectories remain largely unconstrained, and optimization towards final answer can favor early exploitation over generalization. In this work, we ask whether general reasoning ability can be improved by teaching models how to think (the structure of reasoning) rather than what to produce (the outcome of reasoning) and extend traditional RLVR to open ended settings. We introduce structure aware reinforcement learning (SARL), a label free framework that constructs a per response Reasoning Map from intermediate thinking steps and rewards its small world topology, inspired by complex networks and the functional organization of the human brain. SARL encourages reasoning trajectories that are both locally coherent and globally efficient, shifting supervision from destination to path. Our experiments on Qwen3-4B show SARL surpasses ground truth based RL and prior label free RL baselines, achieving the best average gain of 9.1% under PPO and 11.6% under GRPO on math tasks and 34.6% under PPO and 30.4% under GRPO on open ended tasks. Beyond good performance, SARL also exhibits lower KL divergence, higher policy entropy, indicating a more stable and exploratory training and generalized reasoning ability.
Why Reasoning Fails to Plan: A Planning-Centric Analysis of Long-Horizon Decision Making in LLM Agents
Large language model (LLM)-based agents exhibit strong step-by-step reasoning capabilities over short horizons, yet often fail to sustain coherent behavior over long planning horizons. We argue that this failure reflects a fundamental mismatch: step-wise reasoning induces a form of step-wise greedy policy that is adequate for short horizons but fails in long-horizon planning, where early actions must account for delayed consequences. From this planning-centric perspective, we study LLM-based agents in deterministic, fully structured environments with explicit state transitions and evaluation signals. Our analysis reveals a core failure mode of reasoning-based policies: locally optimal choices induced by step-wise scoring lead to early myopic commitments that are systematically amplified over time and difficult to recover from. We introduce FLARE (Future-aware Lookahead with Reward Estimation) as a minimal instantiation of future-aware planning to enforce explicit lookahead, value propagation, and limited commitment in a single model, allowing downstream outcomes to influence early decisions. Across multiple benchmarks, agent frameworks, and LLM backbones, FLARE consistently improves task performance and planning-level behavior, frequently allowing LLaMA-8B with FLARE to outperform GPT-4o with standard step-by-step reasoning. These results establish a clear distinction between reasoning and planning.