Junlan Feng
Publications
Relay, Don't Route: Adaptive Population Handoff for Cost-Efficient LLM-Driven Evolution
Large language model (LLM)-driven evolution has shown promise for program search and algorithm discovery, but relying on strong models throughout long evolutionary runs is costly. A natural alternative is to combine cheap and strong models under a fixed inference budget. However, existing approaches typically allocate models at the level of individual queries or mutation steps, overlooking that evolutionary search is \textit{stateful}: each generated candidate changes the population from which subsequent mutations are produced. We empirically analyze LLM-driven evolutionary trajectories and find that search progress is strongly front-loaded, early trajectory performance is informative but noisy, and cheap models recover much of the early progress achieved by strong models at lower cost. Motivated by these findings, we propose \textbf{\model}, a training-free framework that shifts budget allocation from individual calls to evolving populations through adaptive \textit{population handoff}. A cheap model explores multiple trajectories in short blocks allocated by a bandit scheduler. Relay Gain, defined as the marginal improvement of a compact, quality-diverse candidate bank constructed for handoff, serves as the scheduler reward and determines when to hand off. The curated candidates initialize a shared strong model population for refinement. Across four benchmarks and three budgets, \model achieves the highest mean score in 11 of 12 settings, outperforming competitive baselines. Our results suggest that in stateful search, budget allocation should be organized around the population, not the individual call.
SeaEvo: Advancing Algorithm Discovery with Strategy Space Evolution
LLM-guided evolutionary search has emerged as a promising paradigm for automated algorithm discovery, yet most systems track search progress primarily through executable programs and scalar fitness. Even when natural-language reflection is used, it is often used locally in mutation prompts or stored without an explicit population-level organization of strategic directions. As a result, evolutionary search can struggle to distinguish syntactically different implementations of the same idea, preserve lower-fitness but strategically promising directions, or detect when an entire family of strategies has saturated. We introduce \model, a modular strategy-space layer that elevates natural-language strategy descriptions from transient prompt context to first-class population-level evolutionary state in LLM-driven program search. \model augments each candidate program with an explicit natural language strategy description and uses this representation in three ways: Strategy Articulation turns mutation into a diagnose-direct-implement process; Stratified Experience Retrieval organizes the archive into strategy clusters and selects inspirations by behavioral complementarity; and Strategic Landscape Navigation periodically summarizes effective, saturated, and underexplored strategy families to guide future mutations. Across mathematical algorithm discovery, systems optimization, and agent-scaffold benchmarks, \model improves the underlying evolutionary backbones in most settings, with particularly large gains (21% relative improvement) on open-ended system optimization tasks. These results suggest that persistent strategy representations provide a practical mechanism for improving the robustness and efficiency of LLM-guided evolutionary search, suggesting a path toward compound AI systems that accumulate algorithmic knowledge over time.
CCR-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Complex Constraints, Control Flows, and Real-World Cases
Enhancing the ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow complex instructions is critical for their deployment in real-world applications. However, existing evaluation methods often oversimplify instruction complexity as a mere additive combination of atomic constraints, failing to adequately capture the high-dimensional complexity arising from the intricate interplay of content and format, logical workflow control, and real-world applications. This leads to a significant gap between current evaluation practices and practical demands. To bridge this gap, we introduce CCR-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to assess LLMs' adherence to complex instructions. CCR-Bench is characterized by: (1) deep entanglement of content and formatting requirements in task specifications; (2) instructions that involve intricate task decomposition, conditional reasoning, and procedural planning; and (3) evaluation samples derived entirely from real-world industrial scenarios. Extensive experiments on CCR-Bench demonstrate that even state-of-the-art models exhibit substantial performance deficiencies, clearly quantifying the gap between current LLM capabilities and the demands of realworld instruction understanding. We believe that CCR-Bench offers a more rigorous and realistic evaluation framework, advancing the development of LLMs toward the next generation of models capable of understanding and executing complex tasks in industrial applications.