Yong Liu
Publications
Proxy OPD: On-Policy Distillation with Transferable Relative Proxy Update
Post-training for large language models typically couples policy exploration with model optimization, hindering the reuse of high-reward behaviors from policy exploration. While on-policy distillation alleviates this by consolidating independently optimized experts, its reliance on matching absolute expert distributions can yield suboptimal supervision, especially when the target model possesses a different prior or already surpasses the expert's capabilities. To alleviate this, we introduce Proxy OPD (P-OPD), an asynchronous post-training framework that transfers reward-induced policy improvements rather than absolute policy distributions. P-OPD first optimizes a proxy policy via reward feedback. It then extracts the relative distributional changes between the proxy's initial and optimized states, transferring these directional updates through the target model's own on-policy trajectories while retaining the target policy as the reference. This decoupled formulation requires the proxy to provide merely a useful direction of improvement rather than superior absolute capability, enabling update signals from older or weaker proxies to remain highly effective. Systematic experiments on Qwen3-family models across mathematical reasoning and code generation demonstrate that P-OPD consistently enhances already strong target models. Furthermore, transfer intensity can be dynamically modulated through signal scaling, making the extracted update signals seamlessly reusable across diverse model variants and training configurations. These results establish relative policy updates as highly reusable, adjustable assets for scalable, reward-based post-training.
The Agent's First Day: Benchmarking Learning, Exploration, and Scheduling in the Workplace Scenarios
The rapid evolution of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has advanced workflow automation; however, existing research mainly targets performance upper bounds in static environments, overlooking robustness for stochastic real-world deployment. We identify three key challenges: dynamic task scheduling, active exploration under uncertainty, and continuous learning from experience. To bridge this gap, we introduce \method{}, a dynamic evaluation environment that simulates a "trainee" agent continuously exploring a novel setting. Unlike traditional benchmarks, \method{} evaluates agents along three dimensions: (1) context-aware scheduling for streaming tasks with varying priorities; (2) prudent information acquisition to reduce hallucination via active exploration; and (3) continuous evolution by distilling generalized strategies from rule-based, dynamically generated tasks. Experiments show that cutting-edge agents have significant deficiencies in dynamic environments, especially in active exploration and continual learning. Our work establishes a framework for assessing agent reliability, shifting evaluation from static tests to realistic, production-oriented scenarios. Our codes are available at https://github.com/KnowledgeXLab/EvoEnv