Yiming Ren
Publications
Mitigating the Reasoning Tax in Vision-Language Fine-Tuning with Input-Adaptive Depth Aggregation
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on visual instruction data often improves perceptual capabilities in vision-language models (VLMs) while degrading reasoning performance, creating a persistent reasoning tax during post-training. We investigate whether this degradation is related to disrupted access to depth-wise representations, and find that even fixed cross-depth aggregation substantially restores reasoning, suggesting that preserved cross-depth access is an important missing factor in VLM fine-tuning. Building on this observation, we propose Input-Adaptive Depth Aggregation (IADA), a lightweight mechanism that makes cross-depth retrieval input-adaptive, modality-aware, and efficiently parameterized through a low-rank bottleneck. On Qwen3-VL-2B, IADA improves the average reasoning score by 9.5 points and the average perception score by $3.3$ points over LoRA-only fine-tuning with only 0.14M additional parameters, with the strongest gains appearing in parameter-efficient low-rank settings.
SIN-Bench: Tracing Native Evidence Chains in Long-Context Multimodal Scientific Interleaved Literature
Evaluating whether multimodal large language models truly understand long-form scientific papers remains challenging: answer-only metrics and synthetic "Needle-In-A-Haystack" tests often reward answer matching without requiring a causal, evidence-linked reasoning trace in the document. We propose the "Fish-in-the-Ocean" (FITO) paradigm, which requires models to construct explicit cross-modal evidence chains within native scientific documents. To operationalize FITO, we build SIN-Data, a scientific interleaved corpus that preserves the native interleaving of text and figures. On top of it, we construct SIN-Bench with four progressive tasks covering evidence discovery (SIN-Find), hypothesis verification (SIN-Verify), grounded QA (SIN-QA), and evidence-anchored synthesis (SIN-Summary). We further introduce "No Evidence, No Score", scoring predictions when grounded to verifiable anchors and diagnosing evidence quality via matching, relevance, and logic. Experiments on eight MLLMs show that grounding is the primary bottleneck: Gemini-3-pro achieves the best average overall score (0.573), while GPT-5 attains the highest SIN-QA answer accuracy (0.767) but underperforms on evidence-aligned overall scores, exposing a gap between correctness and traceable support.