Zhaorui Yang
Publications
EviLink: Multi-Path Schema Linking with Uncertainty-Guided Evidence Acquisition for Large-Scale Text-to-SQL
Schema linking is a difficult and important step in large-scale Text-to-SQL, where systems must identify a compact yet sufficient schema context from large and ambiguous databases. Existing methods often treat schema linking as deterministic selection around a single SQL path, but complex questions may admit multiple valid realizations with different schema needs. We reframe schema linking as uncertainty-aware schema-need inference over multiple plausible SQL paths, where the system distinguishes required schema items from path-dependent uncertain ones and acquires evidence only where needed. We instantiate this reframing with EviLink, which combines multi-hypothesis schema grounding with uncertainty-guided evidence acquisition. Experiments on BIRD-Dev and Spider2-Snow show that this perspective improves the balance among schema completeness, schema relevance, and token cost. On Spider2-Snow, EviLink achieves 90.15% field-level strict recall rate, uses 123.30K average tokens, and improves downstream SQL generation under a fixed generator.
IDRBench: Interactive Deep Research Benchmark
Deep research agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) can perform multi-step reasoning, web exploration, and long-form report generation. However, most existing systems operate in an autonomous manner, assuming fully specified user intent and evaluating only final outputs. In practice, research goals are often underspecified and evolve during exploration, making sustained interaction essential for robust alignment. Despite its importance, interaction remains largely invisible to existing deep research benchmarks, which neither model dynamic user feedback nor quantify its costs. We introduce IDRBench, the first benchmark for systematically evaluating interactive deep research. IDRBench combines a modular multi-agent research framework with on-demand interaction, a scalable reference-grounded user simulator, and an interaction-aware evaluation suite that jointly measures interaction benefits (quality and alignment) and costs (turns and tokens). Experiments across seven state-of-the-art LLMs show that interaction consistently improves research quality and robustness, often outweighing differences in model capacity, while revealing substantial trade-offs in interaction efficiency.