K. E. Maghraoui
Publications
Beyond Static Leaderboards: Predictive Validity for the Evaluation of LLM Agents
Agent benchmarks are growing fast, but no single benchmark touches more than four or five of the dimensions that deployment exposes. This paper aggregates the largest coordinated deep-dive of one MCP-based industrial-agent benchmark to date: fourteen parallel implementation studies covering new asset classes (including a multi-modal visual extension), alternative orchestrations, retrieval strategies, reasoning modes, infrastructure optimizations, and evaluation-methodology probes. Consolidating those studies with seven prior agent benchmarks, we argue that aggregate-score leaderboards systematically underspecify deployed-agent evaluation. Rankings derived from aggregate scores do not transfer to out-of-distribution settings; recent public-to-hidden competition retrospectives provide direct empirical evidence of this rank instability. We propose ranking configurations by predictive validity, the correlation between in-sample and out-of-sample rank, rather than in-sample mean, and report a twelve-tier measurement apparatus that exposes the deployment-relevant dimensions HELM and its agent-era successors collapse. The position is operationalized through three falsifiable out-of-distribution criteria with explicit thresholds; existing evidence partly supports it but is too thin to confirm. We close with a pre-registered pilot design and a field-level vision for what the next generation of agentic benchmarks should report.
PHMForge: A Scenario-Driven Agentic Benchmark for Industrial Asset Lifecycle Maintenance
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed for complex tool-orchestration tasks, yet existing benchmarks fail to capture the rigorous demands of industrial domains where incorrect decisions carry significant safety and financial consequences. To address this critical gap, we introduce PHMForge, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLM agents on Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) tasks through realistic interactions with domain-specific MCP servers. Our benchmark encompasses 75 expert-curated scenarios spanning 7 industrial asset classes (turbofan engines, bearings, electric motors, gearboxes, aero-engines) across 5 core task categories: Remaining Useful Life (RUL) Prediction, Fault Classification, Engine Health Analysis, Cost-Benefit Analysis, and Safety/Policy Evaluation. To enable rigorous evaluation, we construct 65 specialized tools across two MCP servers and implement execution-based evaluators with task-commensurate metrics: MAE/RMSE for regression, F1-score for classification, and categorical matching for health assessments. Through extensive evaluation of leading frameworks (ReAct, Cursor Agent, Claude Code) paired with frontier LLMs (Claude Sonnet 4.0, GPT-4o, Granite-3.0-8B), we find that even top-performing configurations achieve only 68\% task completion, with systematic failures in tool orchestration (23\% incorrect sequencing), multi-asset reasoning (14.9 percentage point degradation), and cross-equipment generalization (42.7\% on held-out datasets). We open-source our complete benchmark, including scenario specifications, ground truth templates, tool implementations, and evaluation scripts, to catalyze research in agentic industrial AI.
Robust Heterogeneous Analog-Digital Computing for Mixture-of-Experts Models with Theoretical Generalization Guarantees
Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models enable efficient scalability by activating only a small sub-set of experts per input, yet their massive parameter counts lead to substantial memory and energy inefficiency during inference. Analog in-memory computing (AIMC) offers a promising solution by eliminating frequent data movement between memory and compute units. However, mitigating hardware nonidealities of AIMC typically requires noise-aware retraining, which is infeasible for large MoE models. In this paper, we propose a retraining-free heterogeneous computation framework in which noise-sensitive experts, which are provably identifiable by their maximum neuron norm, are computed digitally while the majority of the experts are executed on AIMC hardware. We further assign densely activated modules, such as attention layers, to digital computation due to their high noise sensitivity despite comprising a small fraction of parameters. Extensive experiments on large MoE language models, including DeepSeekMoE and OLMoE, across multiple benchmark tasks validate the robustness of our approach in maintaining accuracy under analog nonidealities.