Renjing Xu
Publications
Learning Context-Aware Motion Priors for Humanoid Control
Motion priors provide powerful guidance for learning naturalistic humanoid behaviors. However, existing methods typically learn a general, task-agnostic prior from the entire reference dataset and apply it uniformly throughout policy training. As a result, the prior cannot distinguish which reference motions are relevant to the current task context, potentially providing irrelevant or conflicting guidance. We present Context-Aware Motion Priors (CMP), a framework that adapts a general motion prior to the current task context without manual skill labels, dataset partitioning, or a separate skill discovery stage. Specifically, CMP learns context-motion compatibility using high-advantage policy rollouts, while a demonstration-based objective keeps the learned relevance grounded in the reference distribution. The resulting relevance scores reweight reference supervision for training a lightweight context-conditioned adapter. To evaluate the effectiveness and generality of CMP, we instantiate it with both Adversarial Motion Priors and Score-Matching Motion Priors. Across five humanoid control tasks, CMP consistently improves task performance and sample efficiency, learns meaningful context-motion alignment, and remains robust to imbalanced reference distributions. These results show that adapting motion priors to task contexts provides more relevant guidance for humanoid policy learning.
RMBench: Memory-Dependent Robotic Manipulation Benchmark with Insights into Policy Design
Robotic manipulation policies have made rapid progress in recent years, yet most existing approaches give limited consideration to memory capabilities. Consequently, they struggle to solve tasks that require reasoning over historical observations and maintaining task-relevant information over time, which are common requirements in real-world manipulation scenarios. Although several memory-aware policies have been proposed, systematic evaluation of memory-dependent manipulation remains underexplored, and the relationship between architectural design choices and memory performance is still not well understood. To address this gap, we introduce RMBench, a simulation benchmark comprising 9 manipulation tasks that span multiple levels of memory complexity, enabling systematic evaluation of policy memory capabilities. We further propose Mem-0, a modular manipulation policy with explicit memory components designed to support controlled ablation studies. Through extensive simulation and real-world experiments, we identify memory-related limitations in existing policies and provide empirical insights into how architectural design choices influence memory performance. The website is available at https://rmbench.github.io/.