Diji Yang
Publications
Retrieval-Augmented Robots via Retrieve-Reason-Act
To achieve general-purpose utility, we argue that robots must evolve from passive executors into active Information Retrieval users. In strictly zero-shot settings where no prior demonstrations exist, robots face a critical information gap, such as the exact sequence required to assemble a complex furniture kit, that cannot be satisfied by internal parametric knowledge (common sense) or past internal memory. While recent robotic works attempt to use search before action, they primarily focus on retrieving past kinematic trajectories (analogous to searching internal memory) or text-based safety rules (searching for constraints). These approaches fail to address the core information need of active task construction: acquiring unseen procedural knowledge from external, unstructured documentation. In this paper, we define the paradigm as Retrieval-Augmented Robotics (RAR), empowering the robot with the information-seeking capability that bridges the gap between visual documentation and physical actuation. We formulate the task execution as an iterative Retrieve-Reason-Act loop: the robot or embodied agent actively retrieves relevant visual procedural manuals from an unstructured corpus, grounds the abstract 2D diagrams to 3D physical parts via cross-modal alignment, and synthesizes executable plans. We validate this paradigm on a challenging long-horizon assembly benchmark. Our experiments demonstrate that grounding robotic planning in retrieved visual documents significantly outperforms baselines relying on zero-shot reasoning or few-shot example retrieval. This work establishes the basis of RAR, extending the scope of Information Retrieval from answering user queries to driving embodied physical actions.
Classroom Final Exam: An Instructor-Tested Reasoning Benchmark
We introduce \CFE{} (\textbf{C}lassroom \textbf{F}inal \textbf{E}xam), a multimodal benchmark for evaluating the reasoning capabilities of large language models across more than 20 STEM domains. \CFE{} is curated from repeatedly used, authentic university homework and exam problems, together with reference solutions provided by course instructors. \CFE{} presents a significant challenge even for frontier models: the newly released Gemini-3.1-pro-preview achieves an overall accuracy of 59.69\%, while the second-best model, Gemini-3-flash-preview, reaches 55.46\%, leaving considerable room for improvement. Beyond leaderboard results, we perform a diagnostic analysis by decomposing reference solutions into reasoning flows. We find that although frontier models can often answer intermediate sub-questions correctly, they struggle to reliably derive and maintain correct intermediate states throughout multi-step solutions. We further observe that model-generated solutions typically have more reasoning steps than those provided by the instructor, indicating suboptimal step efficiency and a higher risk of error accumulation. The data and code are available at https://github.com/Analogy-AI/CFE_Bench.