Yunjie Pan
Publications
ScaleBITS: Scalable Bitwidth Search for Hardware-Aligned Mixed-Precision LLMs
Post-training weight quantization is crucial for reducing the memory and inference cost of large language models (LLMs), yet pushing the average precision below 4 bits remains challenging due to highly non-uniform weight sensitivity and the lack of principled precision allocation. Existing solutions use irregular fine-grained mixed-precision with high runtime overhead or rely on heuristics or highly constrained precision allocation strategies. In this work, we propose ScaleBITS, a mixed-precision quantization framework that enables automated, fine-grained bitwidth allocation under a memory budget while preserving hardware efficiency. Guided by a new sensitivity analysis, we introduce a hardware-aligned, block-wise weight partitioning scheme, powered by bi-directional channel reordering. We formulate global bitwidth allocation as a constrained optimization problem and develop a scalable approximation to the greedy algorithm, enabling end-to-end principled allocation. Experiments show that ScaleBITS significantly improves over uniform-precision quantization (up to +36%) and outperforms state-of-the-art sensitivity-aware baselines (up to +13%) in ultra-low-bit regime, without adding runtime overhead.
Unveiling the Potential of Quantization with MXFP4: Strategies for Quantization Error Reduction
Large Language Models (LLMs) have intensified the need for low-precision formats that enable efficient, large-scale inference. The Open Compute Project (OCP) Microscaling (MX) standard is attractive due to its favorable hardware efficiency, but its 4-bit variant (MXFP4) lags behind NVIDIA's NVFP4 in accuracy, limiting adoption. We introduce two software-only techniques, Overflow-Aware Scaling (OAS) and Macro Block Scaling (MBS), that improve MXFP4 quantization fidelity without requiring hardware changes. OAS reduces overall errors by increasing effective dynamic range under power-of-two block scaling, while MBS allocates higher-precision scaling at a coarser granularity to better preserve outliers. Across multiple LLMs and standard downstream benchmarks, OAS and MBS reduce the end-to-end accuracy gap between MXFP4 and NVFP4 from about 10% to below 1% on average, while incurring modest GEMM overhead (6.2% on average). These results re-establish MXFP4 as a practical alternative to NVFP4, enabling near-NVFP4 accuracy while retaining MX's hardware-efficiency advantages (e.g., 12% relative area savings in tensor cores).