Xiaodan Liang
Publications
Intend, Reflect, Refine: An Adaptive Multimodal Reflection Framework for Autonomous Driving
Recent Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have advanced end-to-end autonomous driving by incorporating reasoning for better interpretability and planning quality. However, most existing approaches directly generate the final trajectory without explicitly examining its future consequences, which limits their reliability in complex and dynamic environments. To address this limitation, we propose IRR-Drive (Intend, Reflect, Refine), an adaptive multimodal reflection framework for autonomous driving. Specifically, to tightly couple high-level reasoning with physical constraints, IRR-Drive first generates a preliminary textual intention and anticipates potential interactions by predicting future semantic bird's-eye view (BEV) representations. This dual-modality (Text + BEV) reflection space explicitly models anticipated scene evolution, enabling the model to rigorously self-correct and refine its initial intent before generating the final trajectory. Furthermore, to balance planning performance and computational efficiency, we construct reflection-oriented training data and design an adaptive reflection reward, enabling the model to adaptively select its reasoning mode according to scene complexity. Instead of using reasoning primarily as an auxiliary interpretation, IRR-Drive directly integrates an adaptive reflection mechanism into the planning framework, enabling grounded, decision-aware trajectory correction that is driven by scene complexity. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on the NAVSIM benchmark in both PDMS and EPDMS. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our multimodal reflection framework and validate the efficacy of the proposed adaptive reflection strategy.
RADAR: Revealing Asymmetric Development of Abilities in MLLM Pre-training
Pre-trained Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) provide a knowledge-rich foundation for post-training by leveraging their inherent perception and reasoning capabilities to solve complex tasks. However, the lack of an efficient evaluation framework impedes the diagnosis of their performance bottlenecks. Current evaluation primarily relies on testing after supervised fine-tuning, which introduces laborious additional training and autoregressive decoding costs. Meanwhile, common pre-training metrics cannot quantify a model's perception and reasoning abilities in a disentangled manner. Furthermore, existing evaluation benchmarks are typically limited in scale or misaligned with pre-training objectives. Thus, we propose RADAR, an efficient ability-centric evaluation framework for Revealing Asymmetric Development of Abilities in MLLM pRe-training. RADAR involves two key components: (1) Soft Discrimination Score, a novel metric for robustly tracking ability development without fine-tuning, based on quantifying nuanced gradations of the model preference for the correct answer over distractors; and (2) Multi-Modal Mixture Benchmark, a new 15K+ sample benchmark for comprehensively evaluating pre-trained MLLMs' perception and reasoning abilities in a 0-shot manner, where we unify authoritative benchmark datasets and carefully collect new datasets, extending the evaluation scope and addressing the critical gaps in current benchmarks. With RADAR, we comprehensively reveal the asymmetric development of perceptual and reasoning capabilities in pretrained MLLMs across diverse factors, including data volume, model size, and pretraining strategy. Our RADAR underscores the need for a decomposed perspective on pre-training ability bottlenecks, informing targeted interventions to advance MLLMs efficiently. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Nieysh/RADAR.