Cheng Yan
Publications
Beyond Global Routing Aggregation: Phase-Aware Expert Merging for MoE Vision-Language Models
Mixture-of-experts vision-language models (MoE-VLMs) increase model capacity with sparse expert activation, yet deployment requires storing the full expert pool. Training-free expert merging reduces this burden, and many routing-based methods aggregate routing statistics across all tokens to determine merge compatibility. However, MoE-VLM inference is phase-structured: image-context tokens carry visual content, question tokens specify the query, and answer tokens produce the output, with different counts and routing distributions. Because image-context tokens are far more numerous, global aggregation can overemphasize image-context processing and obscure phase-conditioned expert roles, making experts serving different phases appear interchangeable and degrading model performance. We therefore argue that MoE-VLM expert merging should preserve phase-conditioned expert roles, judging compatibility by how experts serve different phases rather than globally aggregated routing statistics. Based on this view, we propose RoleMerge, a training-free method that constructs each expert's Routing Role Profile (RRP) from phase-normalized routing statistics, capturing its relative phase preference. Guided by expert-phase information loss, RoleMerge merges experts with compatible profiles and their corresponding router entries while preserving answer-decoding expert distinctions. Experiments on three models and multiple benchmarks show that RoleMerge preserves more of the full model's performance than alternative expert-merging methods at matched expert-retention ratios, with relative improvements of up to 9.6 percent in six-task macro-average performance. These results validate phase-conditioned expert roles as a more effective basis than global routing aggregation for MoE-VLM expert merging.
DAVET: Denoising-Aware Visual Evidence Trajectory Allocation for Diffusion Vision-Language Models
Diffusion vision-language models (dVLMs) iteratively denoise masked responses while conditioning each denoising step on visual evidence, making visual conditioning a substantial recurring inference cost. Unlike autoregressive decoding, diffusion generation repeatedly revisits the entire response as uncertainty evolves. Our analysis reveals that visual evidence demand is strongly step-dependent, motivating adaptive allocation across denoising steps. Existing inference acceleration methods operate through decoding-side strategies or visual token compression via pruning and merging, but do not explicitly treat visual evidence as a resource whose demand evolves across the diffusion process. Therefore, we present Denoising-Aware Visual Evidence Trajectory Allocation (DAVET), a training-free framework that allocates visual evidence according to the evolving generation state. Starting from a phase-conditioned evidence trajectory, the proposed allocation policy uses operation demand to set an evidence reserve whose allocation at each denoising step is modulated by trajectory risk. DAVET realizes the resulting budgets through a hierarchy of evidence views constructed from a single visual encoding, separating when and how much evidence is needed from how the evidence views are constructed. Evaluated on two representative dVLMs, LLaDA-V and LaViDa, across multiple visual-understanding benchmarks, DAVET achieves an average speedup of 1.55$\times$ with an average relative performance drop of 1.86\%, showing that denoising-aware visual evidence allocation can reduce visual conditioning cost while largely preserving generation quality.
UPAIR: Diagnosing Reasoning States via Uncertainty-Progress Alignment for Selective Intervention
While test-time scaling improves the problem-solving ability of large reasoning models (LRMs) through additional inference-time computation, it can also exacerbate overthinking and underthinking, which we formulate as reasoning state--action mismatch. Resolving this mismatch requires reliable reasoning state diagnosis, yet single-signal monitors provide ambiguous evidence, while steering-based controllers often rely on outcome-labeled supervision or model-specific calibration. We introduce the Uncertainty--Progress Alignment Hypothesis, which posits that the relative transition timing of proxy answer uncertainty and latent reasoning progress distinguishes healthy, stagnant, and ready states that warrant different subsequent actions. Building on this insight, we propose UPAIR, a training-free framework that couples lightweight uncertainty monitoring with event-triggered joint diagnosis and maps the resulting state to native continuation, selective strategy switching, or verification-guided stopping. Across three LRMs and five cross-domain benchmarks, the stagnation diagnosis detects 64.3% of natural errors while flagging only 5.4% of correct samples, revealing a dynamic reasoning regularity shared across models and tasks. End to end, UPAIR improves accuracy by up to 16.67 percentage points and reduces generated tokens by up to 29.64%, demonstrating the effectiveness of its integrated diagnosis and intervention, while online diagnosis costs less than 1% of natural-generation time.