Yue Guo
Publications
ChartAnno: Evaluating MLLMs for Chart Annotation Generation
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant progress in chart understanding, generation, and editing, but their ability to annotate existing charts remains underexplored. Annotating charts is a common yet challenging communicative task, requiring models to infer intended messages, interpret chart semantics, and place appropriate textual or graphical elements. To address this gap, we introduce ChartAnno, a benchmark for evaluating MLLMs on chart annotation generation. It contains 1,200 real-world charts with paired code and annotation instructions across three levels of instruction specificity. We evaluate 10 representative MLLMs under two primary input settings: (1) chart code alone and (2) both chart code and chart image, and further include a chart image-only ablation study. Results show that proprietary models remain stronger overall, although large-scale open-source models narrow the gap. More specific instructions improve annotation quality, while inferring abstract intent remains most difficult for current MLLMs. Providing chart images brings limited overall gains, with improvements mainly appearing in design-related metrics. These findings highlight chart annotation generation as a challenging task requiring semantic grounding and effective annotation design. Code and data will be released in a future version.
Does Accuracy Equal Evidence? Reasoning Faithfulness under KV Cache Compression
KV cache compression is commonly evaluated by final-answer accuracy, implicitly assuming that preserving the answer also preserves the reasoning that supports it. We test this assumption for large reasoning models and show that it can fail: under compression, correct answers and the validity of their visible supporting rationales can be preserved at different rates. We study this failure with a controlled fixed-trace replay protocol, which holds reasoning content fixed and isolates whether compression preserves usable information from an already available trace. We evaluate ten token-eviction KV compression methods and one quantization method on three models across mathematical reasoning, scientific QA, clinical calculation, and long-context retrieval. We measure final accuracy, answer-chain consistency, and perturbation faithfulness. Across tasks, token-eviction methods can preserve competitive final-answer accuracy while substantially degrading chain support or perturbation faithfulness. We call this the answer-evidence gap. A coverage-preserving quantization control is substantially less affected, suggesting that the failure is tied less to KV memory reduction itself than to losing access to parts of the reasoning trace. Code is available at https://github.com/famous-blue-raincoat/Safe_KV_Compress.